Új hozzászólás Aktív témák

• #1750 Blyan félisten Ed Parker #1749

  Új Válasz 2015-10-13 12:12:36 #1750

  Új hozzászólás

  Összes hozzászólása itt Válaszok az összes hozzászólására itt Válaszok erre a hozzászólásra

  Privát üzenet küldése

  

  Blyan

  félisten

  válasz Ed Parker #1749 üzenetére

  A cikk végén még mindig ez az álláspont:

  There are two big takeaways from the results here. First, the Samsung phone did have consistently lower battery life results than the TSMC phone. The one exception was the WebGL test, in which the Samsung phone barely edged out the TSMC phone.

  Second, even though that's true, the Geekbench test was the only test that caused what we would believe to be a significant difference, one that we can definitely attribute to the SoC rather than the screen or the battery itself or some other system component. All three of the other tests showed the two phones scoring within two to three percent of each other, which just happens to be the same figure Apple quoted to the press last week. The heavier Geekbench test, on the other hand, showed the TSMC phone lasting an average of 28 percent longer than the Samsung phone.

  So there are definitely circumstances under which the TSMC phone will last longer than the Samsung phone, but it's not a universal problem. A Samsung chip that's mostly idling or even one under modest CPU and GPU load, though, is going to behave in just about the same way as a TSMC chip. And the kinds of CPU-intensive work that the Samsung chip seems to struggle with just aren't that common on smartphones.

  A végkövetkeztetés pedig ez volt:

  Most of the time, iPhone 6S battery life should be similar no matter which chip your phone is using.

  Született még olyan teszt, ahol ekkora különbség van, mint a Geekbench esetén?

  [ Szerkesztve ]

  The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of the Force.

Új hozzászólás Aktív témák